<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://rneighbors.org">
<channel>
 <title>Jim L.&#039;s blog</title>
 <link>http://rneighbors.org/blog/97</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>FREE Recycling of CFLs</title>
 <link>http://rneighbors.org/node/4683</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://rneighbors.org/files/images/cfl_carrying.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rpu.org/your_home/rebates_and_incentives/conserve_and_save/cfl_faq/&quot;&gt;Compact fluorescent lamps&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;acronym title=&quot;Compact Fluorescent Lamp&quot;&gt;CFL&lt;/acronym&gt;s) are supposed to be better for the environment because they are more energy efficient than comparable incandescent light bulbs. And, although they cost more to buy initially, you usually save money in the long run since they last so much longer. You can even sometimes find rebates to help offset some of the initial cost.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem with &lt;acronym title=&quot;Compact Fluorescent Lamp&quot;&gt;CFL&lt;/acronym&gt;s is that they contain a small amount of mercury, which means that you should &lt;em&gt;never&lt;/em&gt; throw them away with your regular trash. Unfortunately, it&#039;s unrealistic to expect the average person to bring dead &lt;acronym title=&quot;Compact Fluorescent Lamp&quot;&gt;CFL&lt;/acronym&gt;s to a recycling center and then have to &lt;em&gt;pay&lt;/em&gt; to get rid of them. So, what are we to do?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://rneighbors.org/taxonomy/term/17">Miscellaneous</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:45:35 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Do unto others?</title>
 <link>http://rneighbors.org/node/1105</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In 1795, early American scholar and revolutionary &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Paine&quot;&gt;Thomas Paine&lt;/a&gt; ended his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cooperativeindividualism.org/paine_dissertations_on_first_prin.html&quot;&gt;Dissertations on First Principles of Government&lt;/a&gt; thusly:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An &lt;a href=&quot;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/avidity&quot;&gt;avidity&lt;/a&gt; to punish is always dangerous to liberty. It leads men to stretch, to misinterpret, and to misapply even the best of laws. He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://rneighbors.org/taxonomy/term/8">Government</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:49:49 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It is unacceptable to think?</title>
 <link>http://rneighbors.org/node/1082</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Bush,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How dare you, sir!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know what country you &lt;strong &gt;think&lt;/strong&gt; you&#039;re the president of, but the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution&quot;&gt;First Amendment to the Constitution&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;em &gt;my&lt;/em&gt; country states:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote &gt;
&lt;p&gt;Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I &lt;strong &gt;think&lt;/strong&gt; that also applies to freedom of thought.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For readers who are unaware, Mr. Bush held a testy and impatient news conference today. Why was he testy and impatient? Well, Mr. Bush often gets testy and impatient whenever he &lt;strong &gt;thinks&lt;/strong&gt; his motives or methods are being challenged. To be fair, I &lt;strong &gt;think&lt;/strong&gt; I would get testy and impatient, too, if I my motives or methods were constantly being challenged. The difference, of course, is that Mr. Bush is supposed to be the leader of our country, the protector of our freedom. In particular, that includes the freedom to question our leader&#039;s motives or methods.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://rneighbors.org/taxonomy/term/8">Government</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Another RPU Rate Increase?!</title>
 <link>http://rneighbors.org/node/562</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Rochester Public Utilities (RPU) recently announced an 8.5% rate increase effective April 4, 2006. Many of you may have already heard about this because it was reported by &lt;a href=&quot;http://kaaltv.com/article/view/96992/&quot;&gt;KAAL&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11620346/&quot;&gt;KTTC&lt;/a&gt;, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.postbulletin.com/newsmanager/templates/?a=249021&quot;&gt;Post-Bulletin&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.postbulletin.com/subscribe.asp&quot;&gt;pay subscription&lt;/a&gt; to be able to read the P-B article).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I thought all these stories covered the facts accurately, but not in as much detail as I would have liked. What does KTTC mean when it reports that RPU is &amp;#8220;responding to a nearly 17 percent increase by its wholesale power provider&amp;#8221;? Bob Freund of the Post-Bulletin provides a nice, short answer. &amp;#8220;The city-owned utility is reacting to a jump in its own electric bill.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But for the RPU customer who just wants to make sense of this&amp;#8212;who wants to understand the causes and effects leading up to the rate increase&amp;#8212;I have yet to read anything that ties it all together.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#8217;s what I intend to do. I encourage you to leave comments at the bottom of this post&amp;#8212let me know how I did.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://rneighbors.org/taxonomy/term/4">Business &amp; Economy</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
